Although namely and characteristically, all these aspects of behavior are different, however the present of strong bondage between them is beyond any doubt. These behavioral aspects are so interrelated that disobedience to one leads to contravention of another. In the list of all those insolent behaviors, which are undoubtedly considered in defiance with fundamental standards of living, abortion is notoriously on top. Whether to decriminalize or legalize an unwanted, unnatural, and immoral act of abortion or not:
Nowadays, modern medical technologies allow people to have an abortion based on their own wills and needs in many countries. However, is it ethical enough to do so? Before discussing this ethical issue, we need to consider these questions: Is a fetus a human person who has rights, self-consciousness and self-awareness?
The fact is that there is no sufficient or solid evidence for this question. Some say that a fetus is able to feel pain between twenty to twenty-six weeks during the pregnancy Kutlucan, No matter what the answer is, the better way is to apply this issue with different philosophical perspectives under multiple situations.
Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher who believes that all humans have certain dignity and commands to respect Sandel, According to Kant, all behaviors and actions are done by people simply because they are the right things to do. Second, people do things based on whether it is moral rather than on any purposes.
Kant would believe that an abortion is morally incorrect because it is not right to kill a person and it is considered as a murder under any circumstances.
In other words, no matter what is the situation that the pregnant women encounters, it is always not morally correct to have an abortion to the fetus.
On behalf of this view, an abortion does not have any moral worth because it is considered by Kant as a murder to another person no matter what are those reasons for the pregnancy.
For the purpose of doing an action, Kant believes that the moral worth of an action is neither the expectation for it nor in any principle which requires to borrow its motive from this expectation Kant, This fact brings us to the next philosopher, Jeremy Bentham and his principle of utility.
For instance, if the mother does not have enough financial resources to support the growth of this future child, or the mother knows that the fetus will be born with physical disability, then an abortion is allowed for the reason of achieving a balance of pleasure over pain.
Thus, why not have an abortion? If it is already known that the child is going to suffer all his or her life, why not choose a better way to relieve the pain and turn that into happiness for both sides?
This is clear and logical enough to analyze a solution to an abortion as it offers the capacity of finding a better one than the other. Likewise, an individual cannot be arbitrary to do things only based on his or her own will but to consider the collective pleasure of the majority.
Therefore, an abortion is decided by the meticulous consideration of the overall and utmost happiness as a whole. By comparing viewpoints of Kant and Bentham and relate it to our modern society, it is able to observe that Kant provides a more straightforward answer to whether it is moral to have an abortion.
The standard of Kant is that, the final decision is only based on the moral worth of the action and furthermore, an abortion is a way to kill a person that is always considered as a murder and it is never a moral action.
Thus, although Kant knows an abortion is needed when the mother is raped so hindered by many restrictions from the society or how unwilling the mother is about having that abortion, he would reject it anyway.
Unlike him, Bentham would say that if that is the case, an abortion is not morally wrong accords with the happiness of the mother and the fetus and consider about their future life.
In conclusion, both philosophers provide their moral and ethical perspectives on abortion. Principles of Morals and Legislation.
Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals.Dec 10, · Final paper-Ethics on abortion by jasmine Abortion is defined as a deliberate termination of a pregnancy and it has been a real-world ethical issue for a long time.
The Ethics Of Abortion And Abortion - That follows the Roe v. Wade decision. Abortion Essays] Term Papers words | ( pages) | Preview. Is Abortion Moral or Immoral? - “Is abortion moral or immoral?” We yet have not acquired an answer to this question. Infer by that, we defend about the nature and the moral status of the.
Free Abortion research papers were donated by our members/visitors and are presented free of charge for informational use only. The essay or term paper you are seeing on this page was not produced by our company and should not be considered a sample of our research/writing service.
Abortion ethics essaysAbortion is a controversial subject that has been continually argued over for the last 30 years.
The main question is whether or not abortion should be legal?
Abortion is the destruction of the fetus or unborn child while the child is still in the mother's womb. Dec 10, · Final paper-Ethics on abortion by jasmine Abortion is defined as a deliberate termination of a pregnancy and it has been a real-world ethical issue for a long time.
There are different viewpoints from debates provide arguments on whether it is ethical or moral to terminate a fetus’ life during a pregnancy and before the normal. Majority of debates on abortion ethics, which have happened to occur in any part of the world, is focused on assessing whether a fetus is a person or not.
A very strong argument, usually given by a group of people labeling abortion as an unethical act, is that even if fetus is not a human being, it doesn’t mean that it should be killed, as it.